Login About us Contact us Terms & Conditions

Comments

ROYNON family
published by Anne - 8 years 11 months 27 days ago.

Hello Linda

We have an ancestor in common. Sarah Mercer (bap. 11th August 1785 at Chew Stoke) was the younger sister of my ancestor John Bush MERCER, who was baptised 11th May 1777. There was a brother William bap 23rd April 1780, and another called James bap 3rd November 1782. Their parents were John MERCER, carpenter, otp, and Martha BUSH, otp, married 3rd June 1773 at Chew Stoke by licence, witnesses were John BUSH and Robert MERCER (fathers? brothers?). Sadly the licence no longer exists. Equally sadly, there is a gap in the Chew Stoke registers between about 1740-1753 and I can find no baptism of John MERCER. There is a burial of Robert MERCER, Snr, Oct 10th 1762 at Chew Stoke. There are no mentions of  the name MERCER in Chew Stoke before 1760. I have found mentions of MERCERs in Marksbury up to 1730's, then they seem to have moved out. So, are these the same line? And where did they go 1734-1760? Some MERCERs were in Stanton Prior, near to Marksbury, but I can find no record of the baptism of John MERCER in the area.

Hope this is of use,

Anne


Jesse James Baptism
published by - 8 years 11 months 27 days ago.
Hi Karen, If you cannot find it in the Cheddar Parish Records, then it is possible it could be in the Wells St. Cuthberts Parish Records, I have these Fiche as well as Cheddar and will do a search for you later Alun Urch

William Henry JERVIS
published by Pat Hase - 8 years 11 months 28 days ago.

Thank you so much - this is so helpful!  That William JERVIS who lived with Edwin and Louisa Augusta RICHARDSON must have been Louisa's son by her first husband, George JERVIS.  A William Albert George JERVIS was christened  on the 15 May 1881 at St Chad's Church, Derby s/o George & Louisa JERVIS.(Ancestry).  I originally thought he must have died but now I've discovered that when he married in 1902 he called himself George William Albert JERVIS!  So that eliminates the William JERVIS step-son of Edwin RICHARDSON as being William Henry JERVIS.  Thank you! 

So where was William Henry JERVIS in 1891 and 1901?  Back to the drawing board!  Perhaps he was serving in the Army?   You are correct it was the 5th Royal Irish Lancers which he gave on the 1911 census.

Many thanks.


William JERVIS
published by Anne - 8 years 11 months 28 days ago.

In the school records for 1888 William's father is given as George, occupation labourer. In 1891 it is Edwin Richardson, plumber. George has presumably died, and Edwin is there as step father.

Also, I read the regiment William was in as 5th Royal Irish Lancers..... but I can't find any more information.


Siblings/cousins inter-marriage
published by - 8 years 11 months 28 days ago.
Without looking at parish records for both families, has anyone considered that two Jervis/Jarvis brothers married two Richards sisters (cousins also a possibility) - the apparent duplication of the William Henry name could be caused by something as simple as this and the importance of the name "William Henry" in one or other family? I've seen this kind of thing in parish records of both South and South West England, as well as Ireland. Clatworthy

William jervis
published by - 8 years 11 months 28 days ago.
There is a marriage of Mary Ann Richards, aged 30, daughter of Samuel (deceased) and of William Jarvis, aged 40, s of Edward at St Mary Nottingham 24th July 1879. This appears to correspond with Reg entry Sept 1879 7b 329. Previous census entries for Samuel (Framework knitter) and Hannah Richards show them at St Mary, Byron, Nottingham. Mary is aged 22 in 1871, a cotton winder. She is the eldest of 6 children all the family are listed as born in Nottingham. This does not fit with the Ann Jarvis residing as a widow in Ilkeston in 1881 where she is listed as born in Bristol. The address would fit with the birth place of William Henry however. There is a variation in age too. If she is the daughter of Samuel, she was 22 in 1871 and 30 when she married in 1879 making her circa 32 in 1881 rather than the 28 given. A small difference however. I think that is as far as I can take it.

Page 305 of 485 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310

Forthcoming Events

Library Help Session
Monday, 14th July, 2025 10:30 - 13:00
Workshop by Zoom: In the footsteps of Hans Fowler Price
Wednesday, 23rd July, 2025 19:30 - 20:30
Library Help Session
Monday, 18th August, 2025 10:30 - 13:00
Library Help Session
Saturday, 6th September, 2025 14:00 - 15:30
Physical Members' Meeting
Wednesday, 10th September, 2025 14:30 - 17:00
<- View calendar for more

Recent Comments

Gone but not forgotten
1 months 4 days ago
June 2025 Newsletter
1 months 13 days ago
Cox
2 months 5 days ago
Cox
2 months 5 days ago
Cox
2 months 6 days ago
GOULSTONE
2 months 6 days ago
GOULSTONE
2 months 6 days ago
May 2025 Newsletter
2 months 8 days ago
more comments





Website written and designed by:
Weston IT Solutions
Copyright (c) 2018